Lower price schemes however guarantee that the quality level of the hosting will be less than stellar. Budget hosts can offer low prices because most take a "no-frills," bulk approach towards hosting. All budget hosts leverage shared hosting, in which numerous customer resources are multiplexed upon a single server.

In the case of most budget hosts, many hundreds of customers are located upon single servers or hosting appliances. The net result is that consumers experience a tremendous amount of service degradation in respect to server performance and network efficiency. With a multitude of consumers sharing a single server, any access to service is determined on a first-come, first-serve basis. In effect, consumers compete for all accessible services. Usually, this competition results in a tremendous amount of server load which causes tremendously slow execution of applications on the server, and high levels of latency, or network delay. Most budget hosts therefore cannot guarantee 24/7 uptime due to server load issues.

Many budget hosts might also guarantee "unlimited bandwidth," or unlimited traffic to and from your Web site. Such claims are exaggerations since bandwidth is a finite resource that the budget hosting company purchases from an upstream provider. Further, consumers must remember that the functionality of bandwidth is limited by server performance. If a Web server is inefficiently provisioned and has a large number of hosted Internet domains, that server's performance will become slow and impeded, and will even block requests for Web pages. If a Web server does not allow connections due to the sheer amount of traffic to the server, then the promise of "unlimited bandwidth" becomes effectively meaningless.

Since budget hosts make smaller profit margins than regular hosts, which offer hosting in the $25 to $100 per month range, it can be expected that technical support and customer care functions will not be a high priority for a typical budget host. With a budget host making smaller margins, consumers can assume that that most of the revenue will be retained and not spent on support.

Most industry analysts however peg typical support costs at 30 per cent of a hosting company's revenue stream. Due to the smaller margins that a budget host makes, consumers can deduce that much less human and capital resources will allocated to technical support. This can become a tremendous problem, since most budget-hosting infrastructure is usually stretched to the limit. With a tremendous amount of server issues, due to its bulk approach towards hosting, consumers of such services can expect little effective support for a budget host when a technical issue arises.